www.wvrecord.com
Jan. 5, 2009 | West Virginia's Legal Journal
 
ARGUMENTS

McGraw's tab comes due

7/25/2008 11:44 AM

The question isn't whether Darrell McGraw took the money, but just how much he took.

So said a Washington, D.C., appeals board this month, currently weighing a multi-million dollar dispute between West Virginia's Attorney General McGraw and the federal agency in charge of funding Medicaid.

The ruling puts state budgeteers on notice: brace yourselves, start looking for places to cut. The McGraw Budget Hole soon will become a Mountain State reality.

At issue are $4.1 million in funds McGraw siphoned away from a state lawsuit settlement for his own use, some very political.

McGraw's 2004 suit against drug maker Purdue Pharma had promised to recoup Medicaid monies "fraudulently" spent on the company's products. It succeeded, but when McGraw got the check, the attorney general refused to make Medicaid whole. He kept the money and passed it around to those whom he felt best deserved it.

As readers of these pages know, he spent it not on health care for West Virginia's poor -- paying for hospitals and doctors -- but instead for pet projects and to promote Darrell McGraw across the state.

The attorney general handed exorbitant "legal fees" to plaintiff's lawyers who also are McGraw political supporters. He held press conferences to proclaim his generosity, dishing out much smaller cash grants to dozens of feel-good, non-profit programs.

One grant underwrote a Sesame Street Exhibit at the Clay Center; another funded a pharmacy school at the University of Charleston. That grant got him a plaque on the wall in his honor.

The U.S. Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) originally opened a probe of McGraw's spending spree after his trusted deputy, Fran Hughes, casually outlined her boss' sleight of hand during a public hearing.

"We have arranged a methodology that has prevented the federal government from coming back and seizing money," Hughes said in a momentary fit of hubris before a state Senate committee.

Now the federal government has arranged its own methodology.

This one won't benefit Darrell McGraw's re-election campaign, but it will cost every West Virginia state taxpayer.

This November, we hope you won't forget it.


EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

blog comments powered by Disqus
EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT

SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
THEIR VIEW: Kanawha school board fails test on Constitution - 12/31/2008
THEIR VIEW: Not comprehending the hatred toward Abernathy - 12/30/2008

ARGUMENTS Archive

Gee, this story sounds familiar
Wright was a good man
This is what we do, and this is what you do

BLOG Archive
Do you agree with Judge Ronald Wilson's decision to award $3.9 million in attorneys fees in the Visa/MasterCard settlement?
Yes
No
View Results
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
Where you can find The West Virginia Record
Contact us
By way of introduction