www.wvrecord.com
Nov. 21, 2008 | West Virginia's Legal Journal
 
NEWS

Cross Lanes man sues to clean credit report

8/14/2008 8:30 AM
By Audrey Holsclaw -Kanawha Bureau

CROSS LANES -- A Cross Lanes man is suing a bank after it allegedly refused to remove false charges from his credit report, an act he believes threatens his livelihood.

James Copley, who is representing himself, said he has been denied several loans for cars and home repairs, a mortgage, and an apartment at Dunbar Towers and is currently carrying a credit card interest rate of almost 30 percent, all because of a bad credit score.

Copley's story starts at a dispute in the state attorney general's office. Merrick Bank Corp. apparently refused to remove an outstanding balance of $1,073.55 and close his account with a zero balance and restore his credit, so Copley filed a lawsuit in Magistrate Court on May 12, 2005.

He won a default judgment plus $5,000 in damages, costs and 10 percent interest per year. He collected $5,050, but Merrick Bank Corp. refused to remove any negative references from his credit report.

Copley again filed a lawsuit in the Magistrate Court to try to force Merrick Bank Corp. to remove the references and balance from his credit report. The case was dismissed with prejudice on Aug. 28, 2006.

Copley tried to move the case to Circuit Court on Feb. 6, 2007, and the case was dismissed with prejudice the very next day.

In his lawsuit, filed on Feb. 21, 2008, Copley alleges that on February 28, 2007, Merrick damaged his credit even further by falsely listing that he owed $6,617.41 in late payments since November 2005.

In his "Grounds for Relief," he accuses banks of "perpetrating a great fraud across this country and this Plaintiff in their scams before the average citizen of this country. Banks are betting that the average citizen of this country will not have the time or resources to stop their onslaught against the American people."

Filed in the U.S. District Court of the Southern District of West Virginia, Copley is demanding a "judgment from the Defendant pursuant to the foregoing, simple interest on actual damages if the Court finds that the award of such interest for such period is just in the circumstances."

He is also seeking damages for the loss of cars, home, home repairs, good health, and aggravation.


EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT | DIGG THIS | POST TO DEL.ICIO.US




COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE

blog comments powered by Disqus
EMAIL A FRIEND | PRINT

SUBSCRIBE To get our free email newsletter and make changes to your subscription:
 
 Subscribe to Print Edition
 Renew Print Edition Subscription
Well-informed jurors the best kind - 11/21/2008
THEIR VIEW: It's all about perspective - 11/18/2008

ARGUMENTS Archive

Gee, this story sounds familiar
Wright was a good man
This is what we do, and this is what you do

BLOG Archive
Should the U.S. Supreme Court be taking up this state Supreme Court recusal issue?
Yes
No
View Results
Need to know more about us or have questions? Try the links below:
Where you can find The West Virginia Record
Contact us
By way of introduction




Chicago Steaks



Happiness Spreads